網域名稱放點擊廣告的停放頁面

[哈啦]

最近有一家新的叫做parked.com (http://www.parked.com/tour/?promo=5A855F4252)的停放頁面點擊廣告，可能是剛開張，點擊率和廣告給付都不錯。而且對於非英語和亞洲流量的支援比較好，使用介面也很清爽。有多餘而沒用到的網域名稱不妨指到那裡停放賺點流量費。:thumbsup

http://img482.imageshack.us/img482/5001/parked22aj.gif (http://www.parked.com/tour/?promo=5A855F4252)

[mmk7821]

謝謝

我會加入

用你的連結

???

網域名稱?


可以拿我的主頁

在當中放廣告?

還是整個網域都是她的?

[哈啦]

可以拿我的主頁

在當中放廣告?

還是整個網域都是她的?

基本上它是屬於domain parking服務，所以是將你的domain name指向它的伺服器，由它那邊依據來訪的訪客區域不同出現不同的廣告鏈結，並非一般的廣告商。所以你必須把整個網址指過去由它負責製造頁面才行。

[mmk7821]

基本上它是屬於domain parking服務，所以是將你的domain name指向它的伺服器，由它那邊依據來訪的訪客區域不同出現不同的廣告鏈結，並非一般的廣告商。所以你必須把整個網址指過去由它負責製造頁面才行。
轉址服務可以？


或是　　　　我的是

http://www.hoount.com

然後用城http://ad.hoount.com 是它的網玉

這樣可否？

[哈啦]

然後用城http://ad.hoount.com 是它的網玉

這樣可否？

不行，一定要整個網址指過去給他們的伺服器或直接轉址，你這種次網域型態的應該會違反他們的使用條款。

[mmk7821]

給他們我可以獲利多少?

目前購買網址是2.97美金

可否能賺那麼多?

問個問題

http://www.webmasterclub.org/showthread.php?t=391

免費域名

我需要一個美國程式的PROXY
因為它會檢查IP

我只差IP就通過了

一起努力獲得免費域名吧?

[哈啦]

這要看你的網址有沒有流量，有流量自然點擊廣告的人多，錢就賺得多。

要用proxy可看這裡 (http://www.webmasterclub.org/showthread.php?p=2384)。

[mmk7821]

這要看你的網址有沒有流量，有流量自然點擊廣告的人多，錢就賺得多。

要用proxy可看這裡 (http://www.webmasterclub.org/showthread.php?p=2384)。

我知道有個地方的廣告不錯

是等於流量的廣告

但是使用者是否真的會看內容,就不一定


ＰＲＯＸＹ的那個好像無法使用

第一：https

不允許使用網頁代理

第二：

就算可以網頁代理

代理伺服器的國家也要正確才行

例如：New York

查詢ＩＰ要從New York發出來的ＰＲＯＸＹ才可以順利註冊

[lena99]

正做着呢，哈哈。。。。。。

[拒绝游泳的鱼]

我也是从3号开始挑了一些域名做停放.
目前总收入好像过了60$了,我想请问一下:在选择收款形式里,有4个收款形式.我选的是第一个100$的,是数目到了就能收到款还是下个月才能收到呢?其他的3个在收款时间上有什么区别吗?
希望了解的人能给个答复.

[哈啦]

我也是从3号开始挑了一些域名做停放.
目前总收入好像过了60$了,我想请问一下:在选择收款形式里,有4个收款形式.我选的是第一个100$的,是数目到了就能收到款还是下个月才能收到呢?其他的3个在收款时间上有什么区别吗?
希望了解的人能给个答复.


這家好像是一個月付二次，所以你的最低支付額到了，在下次付款日就會被拿到錢。但由於支付的手段不同，你選擇第一種check支票，寄到你所在的地方可能要一段時間，而且郵費也可能會被扣掉吧？
還是建議用paypal收款最方便，最低支付額又只要二十美元而已。

[yashi]

有點疑惑..如果將主網域提供給他們會不會造成其他子網域受影響..
因我的主網域僅做一個首頁.其他都是利用子網域在架站..主網域幾乎是沒再利用..
提供給他們僅做首頁修改放廣告不會牽連到子網域吧!

[哈啦]

有點疑惑..如果將主網域提供給他們會不會造成其他子網域受影響..
因我的主網域僅做一個首頁.其他都是利用子網域在架站..主網域幾乎是沒再利用..
提供給他們僅做首頁修改放廣告不會牽連到子網域吧!


那當然，如果你是把整個DNS改成他們ns1.parked.com的話。

但你也可以用轉址的方法，將www.你的網址.com指到他們的停放頁面，轉址如下：
http://www.searchnut.com/?domain=你的網址

也可以讓他們的伺服器主動偵測：
http://www.searchnut.com/?domain=refererdetect

[yashi]

今日收到該公司的來函..實在有點看不懂..有高手能幫我解解疑惑嗎? 謝謝!!

ICANN is about to renew the .org, .biz, and .info registry contracts
with a HUGE loophole to allow each registry to charge different
scaled pricing on a per-domain basis and to provide each registry
with a presumptive perpetual monopoly. This means your best domains
may very soon cost you thousands (or more) per year in renewal fees.
We need your help to halt the approval of these contract proposals.
Everyone who owns a domain and cares about its value should post a
comment TODAY to:

http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-28jul06.htm

Its easy: Just email your comments to each of the three following
email addresses:

biz-tld-agreement@icann.org,
info-tld-agreement@icann.org,
org-tld-agreement@icann.org
and then approve the email links they respond with.

The comment period will remain open until 5:00 PM PDT, August 28,
2006. THAT'S TODAY! The comments will be submitted to the ICANN Board
of Directors for the Board to consider at its meeting on September 13,
2006.

If Registries can set "market prices" for each .biz, .info, .org
domain name (ie. $500 or $1 million per year for cars.org or
Google.org etc.. ), then ICANN will have to provide Verisign the same
terms for .com and .net in 2012. ALL of your businesses could be in
serious jeopardy. So we all have a vested interest in this not
happening.

If you CHOOSE to remain silent the fallout will jeopardize all of our
futures. We need your help. Please take a moment to read the comments
others have posted, then create one of your own and mail it off.
http://forum.icann.org/lists/biz-tld-agreement
http://forum.icann.org/lists/info-tld-agreement
http://forum.icann.org/lists/org-tld-agreement


Below are sample letters that were forwarded to us. They give some
good ideas and the consequences of staying silent. Please remember
that the deadline is 5pm today.

THANK YOU!!




The Parked.com Team


Sample #1

To the ICANN Board,

The proposed TLD Registry Renewal Contracts for .info, .biz, and .org
domains have a seriously flawed component whereby a Registry will be
able to set arbitrary rates without price caps at whatever the market
will bear. This will create a financially devastating impact on the
business models of millions of domain and web site owners worldwide.

The impact will be especially damaging to .org and .info domain
owners and site operators who for the most part use .org and .info
domains for non-profit, charitable organizations, and educational
purposes.

Hundreds of billions of dollars have been invested into the core
domain name infrastructure of the Internet with the secured
expectation that acquiring, owning and maintaining domains would
always be affordable and make economic sense for a long term
investment.

To enable and facilitate a way for registry's to financially exploit
and gouge the marketplace would not only be a business tragedy, but
it goes against the grain of all the base principles upon which the
Internet was conceived. It would certainly deter new entrepreneurs
from considering venturing onto the Net if there is no certainty what
their site's URL location will be costing them each year they renew.
And the vast multitude of current domain owners and web site
operators would close up shop if their costs of doing business
skyrocketed on every domain they own.

Even more importantly, this flaw would give an unfair economic
advantage to individuals and corporations who have substantial
capital resources who could outbid less fortunate and startup
entrepreneurs with limited capital.

And inevitably, there would be a tidal wave of costly and time
consuming lawsuits and litigation that ICANN itself would have to
deal with from the millions of impacted domain owners.

Thus, I respectfully request that you reconsider and reconstruct the
contracts and remove this no price caps clause completely.


Sample #2

I wish to express my profound concern that the proposed registry
agreements for .org, .biz and .info do not prohibit predatory price
rises by the registries. ICANN was entirely right to object to
Verisign's SiteFinder service, and for all the right reasons, but
appears not to have learned the obvious lesson: that registries can
be motivated to do things that are not in registrants' interests.
Given that reality, removal of price caps is likely to result in
anticompetitive practices that seriously impact internet
stakeholders. I hope that you will reconsider this aspect of the
agreements.


Sample #3

In permitting even the theoretical hiking of fees for domain name
renewals, ICANN is threatening nothing less than the democratic
nature of the Internet. As an individual, I have been using a .org
domain for some years for a political and social blog website. The
relatively low cost of renewing my domain name and hosting the site
is extremely important to me. Operating such a site now feels like an
extension of my free speech rights! I am counting on you not to do
anything to erode that. Thank you.


Sample #4

As a small business operator, with substantial goodwill invested in
our domain names, I wish to express my strong opposition to the
lifting of price controls. One of ICANN's core principles is the
encouragement of competition at both the registry and registrar
levels. Such competition is incompatible with the kind of
unrestricted monopoly that these proposed agreements would create. I
therefore urge the board to reject the agreements.

[哈啦]

今日收到該公司的來函..實在有點看不懂..有高手能幫我解解疑惑嗎? 謝謝!!


那是他們要大家一起寫信去ICANN抗議有關可能通過的.org .info .biz的新收費政策。有關議題可看：
http://www.domainclub.org/showthread.php?t=13489

[yashi]

那是他們要大家一起寫信去ICANN抗議有關可能通過的.org .info .biz的新收費政策。有關議題可看：
http://www.domainclub.org/showthread.php?t=13489

感謝! 還以為出了問題咧!..英文不懂想抗議真有點難...